Moreton Valance and Leonard Stanley, Glos

Moreton Valance church was fairly sweet with what the OS map clarified as an old moat behind it - we

decided perhaps the original entrance had been on the moat side, as we found the sculpture we had come to see over the door on the back wall to the church. It was a Norman tympanum of St Michael spearing the dragon - or was it in fact another wyvern which I have now learned is the creature on some of our earlier discoveries. Wyverns have two legs whereas dragons have four. I think four legs are visible on this creature so it is a dragon. St Michael is quite pleasingly depicted with lovely folds of material in his dress and some fine looking wings. We both remarked that he had a nicely carved foot, slender and shapely. The overall composition of the picture is a bit confusing, as it was not that easy to make out what was at both sides of the picture: on one side there were some swirly patterns that could simply have been just that; and on the other a plant-like shape that we both swore looked like a potted plant. The centre is also a tad confusing, but as we have discovered, observing these carvings in an attempt to draw them invariably means working out just what is going on. Between the two figures are St Michael's shield and the pennant on the end of his spear.  In many texts which my sister has unearthed, people have often made incorrect statements about what is depicted in tympanums or fonts, and it surprises us that they have not looked closer for the purposes of description. In some cases it has only taken us a matter of minutes to figure out what is happening: sometimes you wonder if these people have just glanced at the carving for five seconds, or if they have seen the original at all.

But I digress; also at Moreton Valance were some very appealing figureheads on the side of the church - I should learn the proper words for all these items but I can't seem to get them to stick in my head despite hearing how my sister and Pevsner describe them. There were a couple of what looked like bear heads, holding both paws up to their mouths in a kind of surprised or giggling way. Okay now it sounds as if I have not looked at them long enough to work out what they are. But in the case of animals, it is not always easy to know what they are supposed to be. (Another such case to follow, at Sutton Benger). Whatever they were, they were cute and amusing, which all good animal carvings tend to be.

Talking of which, Leonard Stanley church held a lovely surprise in the form of two dragons' heads at the main door - they have to be by the same carver who did those we loved at Elkstone. The design, size and shape of the heads is all similar and I am not surprised that other people liked them too, enough to commission one for their own church (or however these things worked). That is a thought actually - how did people decide what to do in those days? The carver could not have shown them a portfolio of photos of his work as he would now. "Here's one I did at Elkstone. If you like I could do something similar here." ... They are fast becoming a favourite of mine.

Inside the church there was a wealth of carving to look at: however, a lot of it was too high up on the walls to see, photograph or draw. There was something weird with two figures and an apple - possibly not Adam and Eve, even though this had been suggested, plus something with Jesus high up and right next to the wall (also very weird). Outside, the well decorated and large tub font was being used as a plant pot and suffering as a result. We were not very impressed with this at all as we felt it would be damaged by the weight of earth.